View Single Post
Old 01-02-2017, 03:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
Duc_Z09
Track Member
 
Duc_Z09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 876
Drives: With the blinker on.
Rep Power: 23
Duc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond reputeDuc_Z09 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shirokenkami View Post
And if I wanted a car with no amenities I'd just buy a race car which does what you're describing far better. It's 2016, a radio that can interact with devices via Bluetooth/USB is pretty much standard on most makes/models. This isn't a major request and every automotive manufacturer in the world is on board for this. Hence my point. I'm about to purchase a $400 radio for mine, if people are paying $20k for a proper audio system then they're f*cking stupid.

If I'm buying a car that was at one point $35k+ and a 2013 model year, I want it to come with a radio that is better than what came in a 1998 BMW 330i. That's not too much to ask.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00O8B7CFS...4CMJYJ5D&psc=1
Didn't the tech package already address all of that stuff?

I'm much more concerned about there not being any meaningful performance upgrades over 9 model years dating back to 2009.
__________________
2009 370z #206 (all mods are Home Depot)
2009 Ducati 848 (full Ohlins, Termignoni, etc)
2003 Grand Cherokee (long arms, big tires, 4.56, lockers)
Duc_Z09 is offline   Reply With Quote