Thread: WTB: Torque
View Single Post
Old 09-08-2016, 05:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
RanRich
Enthusiast Member
 
RanRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 425
Drives: 09 PG Sport M6
Rep Power: 3372
RanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond reputeRanRich has a reputation beyond repute
Default WTB: Torque

Earlier this year I had the car on a Dynojet for a few runs (manual, K&N drop-ins, Bassani catback, untuned)and it put down 290whp/238wtq.But I just recently saw a video of a 7AT Z with Ebay short rams, Z1 test pipes and an HKS catback (also untuned) put down 300whp/276wtq on a different Dynojet.

I don't understand how there can be a difference of 40 wtq and 10 whp between cars. They're both Pre-2012, and the 7AT has 4K more miles. Is one reading wrong and the other close? I'm looking to get Berk resonated test pipes in the future, which will undoubtedly help but am still not sure how there can be that big of a difference.

Anyone else see a discrepancy like this before? Is this just the result of a bad reading?
__________________
AAM | Dynosty | Ecutek | Eibach | Hawk | H&R | Nismo | Stillen | Stoptech | Z1
RanRich is offline   Reply With Quote