View Single Post
Old 06-30-2016, 04:08 AM   #55 (permalink)
GeauxTigers1
Track Member
 
GeauxTigers1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surprise, Az
Posts: 590
Drives: 2017 370Z Nismo
Rep Power: 6745
GeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond reputeGeauxTigers1 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Just researching on the different suspension systems, and while I still really like AST and JRZ, I'm wondering if I'm going to experience a real difference with how I'll be using the car of the Aragosta?

Mainly street driving, not my daily, but will have some track use, nothing competitive just for my own smiles.

So I can confirm, the Aragostas use OEM location and don't need rebuild. While JRZ and AST both appear to need to be rebuilt every few thousand miles and may even need some reinforcing bc of the location? Sorry a bit new to it all, hoping to clarify, but I also don't want to get into something where the Z is down constantly bc of maintenance on the suspension. I'm starting to lean more towards the Aragosta just bc of the ease of it all. Sounds like a much bigger project with the others and just more stuff to break. Last thing I want is more downtime. However if it's not a constant money pit of maintenance, I'm still interested. The price of the other suspension systems doesn't scare me. It's the apparent alterations and rebuild needs that do. I'm a newbie so I'd need to take it to my shop every time I needed. Anyone shed light on this?
__________________
Fast Intentions Kit Stage 2 #076 2017 Twin Turbo 370z Nismo. JMS Built Block, Closed Deck 874whp, 803lbs Tq e85 Ecutek Tune
GeauxTigers1 is offline   Reply With Quote