View Single Post
Old 06-09-2016, 08:49 AM   #11 (permalink)
Chuck33079
A True Z Fanatic
 
Chuck33079's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,265
Drives: 2011 370ztt
Rep Power: 29539
Chuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick M View Post
Not to start a war as it relates to this endless debate, but real world data logging on most platforms/vehicles has shown many times - that once a car is moving ambient intake temps between "short ram" intakes and long tubes is much closer than the internet believes it is - and most of the gains found in long tube intakes is primarily credited to intake velocity and air turbulence, not some dramatic drop in intake temperature.
Yes, once the car is moving temps come down. The temp difference is pretty dramatic in stop and go traffic or normal commuting. Once you get to freeway speeds, you're right, the temps come down. But if you log IATs on this platform, the short rams are sucking in a lot of hot air at lower speeds and you can feel it pulling timing.

EDIT - That's why the OEM setup with drop in filters and silicone maf tubes works so well. It's still drawing outside air. You just leave a few HP on the table vs long tubes.
__________________
2011 MB Touring-Sport-6sp-Nav/GTM TT/FI TT TDX/JTran/Kosmic/Eibach/Hotchkis/SPC/CSF/RPS/SoThatsWhereAllMyMoneyWent

Last edited by Chuck33079; 06-09-2016 at 09:05 AM.
Chuck33079 is offline   Reply With Quote