View Single Post
Old 12-28-2009, 07:28 PM   #59 (permalink)
nicknick
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 438
Drives: Mazda mx5 2007 6sp m
Rep Power: 16
nicknick is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pulpz View Post
C&D claims it was a hardware failure, while Nissan just says the pad isn't designed for track use. There is no specific statement identifying the hardware component that failed ( i.e. cracked brake pad, ruptured brake line, piston assembly. etc. - so abruptly as C&D claims.) Nissan simply states the brake pads are not designed for track use - implying a position of no liability, not specificity identifying the pad as a failed component.

I think until C&D goes into more detail regarding the investigation, I have to call ******** on this as well.
nicknick is offline   Reply With Quote