View Single Post
Old 04-04-2016, 07:56 AM   #3278 (permalink)
Pintsize725
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Austin
Posts: 14,196
Drives: 2016 Mazda 6
Rep Power: 211844
Pintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond reputePintsize725 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leingod View Post
24-70mm for everyday use. 24-135mm if you're tight for money.

Tokina 11-16mm for landscapes.
To elaborate:
So I was thinking of getting the body only and buying two lenses to start off. My thoughts are on the 16-35 f/4L and the 100mm macro f/2.8L. Figured I could get away with using the 100 at track events. What would you recommend? I really want to keep the IS on both if possible. I shoot a lot of family events in small spaces, events out at COTA, landscapes, and flowers. I also want to get back into astrophotography at some point so I'm not sure the f/4 will be enough. I used the 16-35 2.8L before and it was great but so heavy and no IS.
__________________
Tracie
Pintsize725 is offline   Reply With Quote