View Single Post
Old 04-03-2016, 02:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
felix0121
Enthusiast Member
 
felix0121's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: California
Posts: 477
Drives: 2010 370Z Sport 7AT
Rep Power: 67
felix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond reputefelix0121 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Is this true ? : Zero-to-sixty actually doesn't matter so much ?

http://jalopnik.com/porsche-918-prov...***-1558177494

While googling, I found out a pretty interesting (somewhat already outdated though) article saying that the zero-to-sixty is actually not so much important as people usually consider so often.

I have no idea for technical things. I am just an ordinary daily driver who sometimes enjoy my own spirited driving - especially accelerated merging into freeway (exactly as mentioned in that article).

Recently I see so many 'cars' even the daily sedans like Camry, Altima, Accord have all pretty good zero-to-sixty records. It seems like the fact that a car can make zero-to-sixty within 6~7 secs does not look so impressive anymore.

But after I had read that article, I just got to wonder whether the 'real' on-road performance of a car can really be different from the often emphasized zero-to-sixty or not.

* In that article, a Porsche was mentioned. But I don't want to look down to Porsche at all. I believe all cars have their good and bad. I hope it would not make any unnecessary trouble here.




Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

Last edited by felix0121; 04-03-2016 at 03:40 AM.
felix0121 is offline   Reply With Quote