View Single Post
Old 12-27-2009, 06:06 PM   #29 (permalink)
pulpz
Enthusiast Member
 
pulpz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 281
Drives: 09 PG 370Z Sport 6MT
Rep Power: 16
pulpz is on a distinguished road
Default

C&D claims it was a hardware failure, while Nissan just says the pad isn't designed for track use. There is no specific statement identifying the hardware component that failed ( i.e. cracked brake pad, ruptured brake line, piston assembly. etc. - so abruptly as C&D claims.) Nissan simply states the brake pads are not designed for track use - implying a position of no liability, not specificity identifying the pad as a failed component.

I think until C&D goes into more detail regarding the investigation, I have to call ******** on this as well.
__________________

2016 Cayman GTS 6MT / 2017 Q60 Sport / 2012 Acura TL SH-AWD / 2015 Lexus IS 350 AWD F-Sport (Sold) / 2009 PG 370Z Sport 6MT, (Sold) / 2003 SS 350Z Enthusiast 6MT (Sold)
pulpz is offline   Reply With Quote