View Single Post
Old 02-18-2016, 02:41 PM   #5 (permalink)
phunk
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,668
Drives: 370
Rep Power: 974723
phunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond reputephunk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EVOHUNTER View Post
Its really hard to compare these 2.

has nothing to do with the IRS, our cars have irs aswell, along with almost every vehicle

made now.

But I bet your stock C7 will eat up your TT 370z.

The c7 launch control and if its the auto, buh bye.

Our 370z's don't get good traction, 1-2 shift licks balls.

From a roll, you would take the vette, but not from stand still.
Each manufacturer, and often each specific model, uses their own proprietary IRS with entirely different geometry and behavior. A vehicles individual IRS specifications can make it greatly more or less suited for applying big power to the pavement.

Its a difficult debate to stay in very long without both cars side by side for measurements and testing... but you can expect that the Corvette IRS had typical Corvette power in mind during its engineering, and that the 370z had typical 370z power in mind. I would be surprised if the Corvette doesnt have a more longitudinally rigid IRS, along with quite a bit less camber gain on compression.
__________________
Charles @ CJ Motorsports : Website | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube
Home of the 9 second, stock longblock, stock drivetrain 6MT 370z. 9.91 @ 142mph

Last edited by phunk; 02-18-2016 at 02:44 PM.
phunk is offline   Reply With Quote