Quote:
Originally Posted by Minicobra1
Here is an article comparing the 2
don't get me wrong, I love my Z, and in stock forum it will run circles around the mustang in a canyon cruise. On the other hand, I've owned 4 (modified) mustangs, and for very little money put into a few upgrades they can really shine. They really are a lot of bang for the buck, I beat the crap out of those cars and was really surprised at how well they held up to the abuse. Anyone that would disregard the 2011 Mustang with 400+HP as not being a real competitor, obviously lacks experience. We all know you can make any car go fast and handle good, it just takes money.
Not planning on trading in the Z anytime for a 2011 mustang though.
2010 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z Comparison Test on Inside Line
|
so? put money into the z and it would still be faster than the mustang.mustangs do not handle well. they're not made to handle well. and why are they bang for the buck? you used to get a pos car wrapped around two pos underpowerd engines. now for 2011 you get a pos car wrapped around somewhat decent engines. basically, you're paying tens of thousands of dollars for an engine