View Single Post
Old 12-07-2009, 04:07 PM   #34 (permalink)
M.Bonanni
The370Z.com Sponsor
 
M.Bonanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,575
Drives: Fast
Rep Power: 1320
M.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond reputeM.Bonanni has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to M.Bonanni
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick911sc View Post
gotcha, so you're saying you saw a decent change in the baseline as well do to the temperature change. I don't mean to be a pain in the *** I'm just trying to get everything straight for myself.
You have to just look at it as two separate independent tests. The temperature made a huge difference since it was probably 50 degrees in Feb. and 112 in August. I tried to make it as accurate as possible by doing a new baseline dyno before adding the exhaust so we have something to compare to and measure actual gains in similar conditions. So as far as gains go, the numbers should be pretty accurate. As far as overall peak horsepower numbers go, the temperature difference had a big impact. My peak numbers with the Berk HFCs back in February was 299whp. Power wise, nothing on the car changed between that dyno and the baseline I did in August, but the baseline in August was only 282whp average. So basically the only thing the temperature effected was the peak numbers, not the gains since both tests were done back to back with baseline numbers.
__________________
MikeBonanni.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/MikeBonanni
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MBonanni36
Function > Form
M.Bonanni is offline   Reply With Quote