View Single Post
Old 02-03-2015, 01:47 PM   #18 (permalink)
JARblue
A True Z Fanatic
 
JARblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 43
Posts: 36,450
Drives: 11 Z34, 98 E36 M3
Rep Power: 2684440
JARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond reputeJARblue has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by COSMO View Post
Ok lets go over our words here.. (wouldn't) short for (would not).. The bp kit would not be a bad choice.. Tomorrow we will cover another word... lol


You're the one using a damn double (or triple? I can't tell) negative. Your post that I quoted (it is still there) said "not saying bp would be a bad choice". This is what I assumed you meant, despite your earlier comment about Sasha's disciples. You can also read this statement as 'bp would be a good choice'.

Then you tried to change would to wouldn't. So now your statement reads "not saying bp wouldn't be a bad choice". This is a fuckin triple negative that can also be read as 'bp would be a bad choice'.

So I questioned your correction, and you proceed to chastise me for your lack of understanding of the English language? I don't think so

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwick View Post
So can tomorrow's lesson be on the meaning of, or better yet, not using double negatives
No $hit. He's giving me grammar lessons? Seriously? I'm a fuckin grammar Nazi lol


Sorry for the off topic
__________________

2011 370Z 6MT Sport Gun Metallic | ARC | CJM | Ecutek | FI | Fujimura | R2C | SPL | Stillen | TWM | Z1 | ZSpeed |
JARblue is offline   Reply With Quote