Quote:
Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370
This is why I hate car and driver and think it's the worst automotive publication.
The ranked the AMG GTS #2 amongst $100,000+ sports cars. It hasn't even been tested yet. No one knows what it will do against anything. It's pure speculation. So how do you rank the GT-S #2. It could be #1 or #10? We just don't know? So how does C&D make these tabulations? I would really love to know?
Front-Mid-Engine Club
|
And why is the Jag ranked 4th when they claim it's like the GTS, but better looking, and on par with a 911 turbo in performance, but at a fraction of the price?
I call shenanigans on the entire list!
On that note -- wow, the GT-R costs up to 150 grand now, huh
