View Single Post
Old 10-03-2014, 08:38 AM   #2 (permalink)
scottIN
Track Member
 
scottIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Castle, Indiana
Posts: 764
Drives: '12 370Z
Rep Power: 55
scottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond reputescottIN has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I can't comment on California, but did have a conversation with my insurance agent last week about rates and she said that it driven by replacement part costs.

The situation was that I was insuring my new Cherokee - which was only about $2,000 less (new) than my Z was new. Rates for it were around half of what the Z was for the exact same coverage. When I asked why, she explained that because the Z was low production, replacements parts were so much more expensive than for a high production vehicle like the Cherokee.
scottIN is offline   Reply With Quote