View Single Post
Old 08-20-2014, 02:00 PM   #27 (permalink)
Mitco39
A True Z Fanatic
 
Mitco39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,089
Drives: 40th 370z
Rep Power: 132
Mitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phunk View Post
Airflow and pressure are not directly relative anywhere you take reading or measure.
Care to elaborate?

If you have the same restriction downstream of a flow and it is in steady state conditions you will have a very similar flow as long as the device reading the flow has the same cross sectional area. Albeit if you are not in a steady state condition when dealing with air you will have density changes as the pressure changes as it approaches a particular restriction. If pressure was not relative to flow you couldn't have MAP tuning on engines at all as you would never know the mass of air being ingested by the engine.

While I agree with what you are saying I reason that if you have some constant variables then the system becomes measurable and if you wanted to even tunable based on pressures instead of flow rates.
__________________
2007 Chevy Duramax - EFILive Tuned By Me
2010 40th W/ Nav - Boosted Performance - UpRev Tuned By Me
The Mrs. Ride -2012 335XI N55 BMW - Cobb Tuned By Me, Built by her
My Build --> http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...39s-build.html
Mitco39 is offline   Reply With Quote