I was thinking of getting the geiselle trigger group for the tavor when it comes put but at $350 its kind of pricey.
I'll definitely take out the secondary spring.
Its to bad we can't buy the Remington acr version cause personally its better than the bushmaster acr.
I don't get why they don't follow the Remington's version.
I think the acr is better than the scar. From what I read the acr is a bit heavier than the scar
Quote:
Originally Posted by VABAM
Even with the ridiculous mods needed for it to be legal in Cali, I would take a Tavor over an AR-15 or similar rifle any day. The balance and ergos of the Tavor are superior IMO. The last time I had mine at the range I was able to shoot it one handed and be, as some people say, "combat effective" very easily.
Once you get yours I highly recommend removing the secondary sear reset spring (fully reversible) like shown in this video.
After removing the secondary sear reset I feel no need to get an aftermarket trigger.
The Remington has been constantly improving the Remington ACR, just not the Bushmaster ACR (BACR). The non-folding stocking version you saw was most likely the version of the Remington ACR that was submitted for the Individual Carbine Program a few years ago.
I like my BACR but I have lost faith with Bushmaster/Remington with regards to the BACR . So many broken promises with regard to caliber conversions and the availability of different spec barrels. The 6.8 conversion kits do exists but are consider unicorns. All the barrels I've seen have been custom one-offs. The BACR is a good rifle. I would take an BACR over a SCAR 16S. Now the SCAR 17S is another story.
The SCAR can not be converted to left side eject. Now you can swap the side of the charging handle. Same with the ACR.
BTW: Stay Shiny and Bring the Grenades!  |