View Single Post
Old 11-13-2009, 02:43 PM   #135 (permalink)
Red370
A True Z Fanatic
 
Red370's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Posts: 4,391
Drives: your mom to church
Rep Power: 296
Red370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond reputeRed370 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MightyBobo View Post
No, the point you're trying to make is that the a N/A 332 HP 3.7L is good for this price point. In reality, its not that great at all compared to other 6-cylinders. Case in point, the Porsche.

So, revise your point to something along the lines of, "For cars in the sub-50K range, ~330 HP for a 3.7L isn't bad at all", and its very correct .
No sir. What I will do is say that 332hp, for a NA V6, regardless of price, is DAMN good. You have your opinion, I have mine. You choose to compare the VQ to an engine that costs 4 times as much, and in doing a comparo, you compare the average engine output for its size with other cars IN ITS CLASS, by which the GT3 is not. Now back to the point at hand, also comparatively speaking, your comparing a Flat 6 against a V6, two completely different configurations, one built for efficiency and power equally, and one strictly for all out speed applications. Case in point the VQ, excellent power while having decent fuel economy. The GT3 is a race bred car, and thats it. So to say that 332bhp for a V6 is bad, i'd say you are terribly misguided sir.
__________________
2011 Mustang 5.0 | 3.55's | Lethal Performance off road H-Pipe | Magnaflow Muffler Delete | JLT CAI/Bama tuned 417whp/ 404 ft/lbs

Last edited by Red370; 11-13-2009 at 02:46 PM.
Red370 is offline