Quote:
Originally Posted by Alkatraz
Which is......?
I asked you that before.....6 months? 12 months? 5 years?
I have openly invited someone to show me any laws that govern this particular area but no one has responded. It's easy to make statements about what would/should happen without providing any precedent.
Someone mentioned that there was a $1000 non-refundable deposit for the Fast Intentions TT kit pre-order. I don't whether this is true or not as i have only followed that thread very sporadically (and full of jealousy I should add :P). For someone who decided to pull out of their Fast Intentions TT kit pre-order (before the release date was actually announced), would your advice be that they should request their $1000 back?
If Tony said 'No. We had an agreement and I have now invested money into a kit that you no longer want. The $1000 is to cover my costs and you were well aware of this fact when you signed up.' Would your suggestion be for the purchaser to sue Tony and Fast Intentions?
I don't want to turn this into a vendor vs vendor situation, it's just a perfect comparison.
|
Just let it sink in a bit - the judge will make a call based on the evidence presented. What that ruling may be depends on THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED. The customer may print this entire thread and say "look, the vendor is not providing regular updates, has clear supply chain problems, and can not promise any performance date on our contract". The judge may say a reasonable time has already passed and void the contract.
Like I said multiple times, the customer should have paid off the contract and then demanded performance from GTM. That removes the fee from the picture entirely, but I could understand why they wouldn't want to take the chance unless they were local.