Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck33079
In addition, the magazine claims 1.72 whp from an oil change. An amount that low is within the realm of run-to-run dyno variance, and can't be attributed to the oil change. The numbers are "buy these products from our advertisers" numbers.
Are you aware these numbers aren't accurate? Have you ever dynoed the car at another location to verify these quite frankly unheard of numbers, or are you going off the word of the magazine?
It's just the peak numbers that are incorrect. When you look at the change from stock, the Stillen kit gave you 116 extra whp. The custom tune added another 44. These are in line with the experiences of others.
|
Well Chuck... you are trying to school me here, but with all due respect, I'm very aware of dynomometers, correction factors,etc,etc, obviously you don't know much about me, thanks for your input but I don't need it, you are still missing the fundamental points here, and you know what? I'm not going to tell you what it is, it's too long to type all that, and quite frankly you driving a Z, we are having fun with our cars, that's what it really counts,anything else will be unwelcome because your statement/s are not showing finesse a remarkable lack of respect for people that are extremely honest with the community,etc,etc..
Quote:
Originally Posted by elperuano
Pow pow pow.. Winnarrrrr chuck.
|
Peruvian, seems that you have fun with anything that diminishing the CARB legal kit, lets laugh together, you are funny
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shamrock
Just dyno it elsewhere. Prove them wrong. 😊
thanks 
Bart |
No need to do that Sir, there are many variables, but also many fundamental points, it's all good!
