View Single Post
Old 11-04-2013, 06:21 PM   #76 (permalink)
Chuck33079
A True Z Fanatic
 
Chuck33079's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,265
Drives: 2011 370ztt
Rep Power: 29539
Chuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond reputeChuck33079 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by synolimit View Post
I was referring to lag. If full boost can be achieved well below 4000rpm, the turbo is effective at filling the FMIC without seeing any negative effect. Again though it depends on the turbos size. I'm not sure how small the vf39 was but the 09 and 08 WRX/STI get about 38 lbs/min turbos in the vf52 and vf48.
I think we're not communicating well. It seemed like you were talking about the minimum rpm required for the turbo to reach full boost, which you are correct in that the FMIC does not really change that. I was referring to the time it takes for the piping and core to refill after for example, you let off the gas and get back on it again. There was absolutely a noticeable difference between FMIC and TMIC in this regard. It's just physics. Before any pressurized air reaches the motor, it has to pressurize the core and piping. I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but I wanted to make sure we're discussing the same thing.

The VF39 was the same as the VF48, with the outlet of the compressor side having a slightly different shape.
__________________
2011 MB Touring-Sport-6sp-Nav/GTM TT/FI TT TDX/JTran/Kosmic/Eibach/Hotchkis/SPC/CSF/RPS/SoThatsWhereAllMyMoneyWent
Chuck33079 is offline   Reply With Quote