Originally Posted by synolimit

And who made that? How does a bar with a surface area 21.5% larger have a weakness of 166% less? I said I like stuff "like" homer posted because its simple data you can see. But the back half I don't like because it makes no sense to see those types of numbers. Hell even the stillen is 37% stiffer yet has an even greater gap with surface area. Unless WL is made from silly string I don't see it.

I'm not taking out my ***, I'm not looking for help or crying, I could care less how well respected you are, I don't give a rats *** about you. All I said to start this was I don't care for an opinion and don't see one bar being better than another when the data isn't there. Simple, to the point, bitch on.