View Single Post
Old 09-25-2013, 01:59 PM   #15 (permalink)
FortuneLSX-TT
Base Member
 
FortuneLSX-TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Deltona, FL
Posts: 144
Drives: 10 NismoTT MB M6
Rep Power: 16
FortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud ofFortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud ofFortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud ofFortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud ofFortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud ofFortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud ofFortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud ofFortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud ofFortuneLSX-TT has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by osbornsm View Post
Generally Speaking OP:

TOO wide front tire = More Understeer
TOO wide rear = no such thing

*Note: There is such thing as having a tire too wide for the wheel also
As Chuck pointed out it is not as simple as all that. For example, for the stock Nismo sizes at 245 front and 285 rear there is a 40mm stagger. This results in the car driving like a plow under certain conditions (understeer). If you keep the rear the same size and put a wider front tire compared to stock on the front, it will not increase understeer. It will actually bring the car closer to neutral and reduce understeer. The larger front tire creates more grip allowing the car to turn instead of going straight while you're turning.

Conversely, if you simply increased the rear size and left the front alone you would be increasing understeer.

Personally, I went to a 285 front and 305 rear combination. I still have mild understeer that can easily switch to power oversteer. I do plan on going to a 305 square setup to get to neutral and so I can rotate my tires.
__________________
GTM TT, OS Giken GT clutch, Greddy Ti-C, Z1 test pipes, Hawk HP+ pads, steel braided brake lines, ZSpeed CSC, 34r oil cooler, CSF radiator, HKS EVC 6 boost controller, Whiteline sways, Swift Springs, Kinetix adj camber package, Osiris UPrev tune
FortuneLSX-TT is offline   Reply With Quote