Quote:
Originally Posted by ElVee
There are problems with autonomous vehicles. I envision it a bit like a rail system, except our seats can break off to turn while the majority of the group continues on. Then my seat goes where I want.
In the US, we have a ridiculously litigious culture. We like yearn to blame someone/something else for any slight problem. This system won't be perfect, and as such makers of such vehicles are going to feed many a lawyer for life... Heaven forbid someone dies due to an accident or is late getting to a hospital. Or we have arguments about manual mode being engaged or not...
Road work/maintenance is going to have an additional challenge of needing to update car software/mapping. We start relying on software/connectivity/satellites for movement rather than our eyes, hands, and a mechanical vehicle under our control, and we're going to have annoying problems.
I suppose car headlights will sense green/red lights. I see money in selling green flashlights in the future. Or red ones, for that matter.
There are more, but I just think it's not a great idea without actual in place systems.
But no, really, I look forward to Google-powered cars that move on their own and deliver to me ads in my car based on where I am and the things in my vicinity. Kinda like a tour guide "driven" by ad sales.
|
While there are definitely hurdles, it's not all that different than any other automotive technology. Drive by wire seemed ridiculous at one point too.
There was an entire discussion devoted to autonomous vehicles and hacking the vehicle networks at Black Hat this year.
Uber is looking to buy a few and it's an application where it makes perfect sense.
Dispatch From The Future: Uber To Purchase 2,500 Driverless Cars From Google | TechCrunch
__________________
F.I. CF CBE | Avant Garde M310 | BC BR's | ONEighty | Status | EvoR | Stillen | Whiteline | B&M | Bespoke Details
Boosted Performance | Precision Turbo | Tial | HKS | Innovate Motorsports | Bosch | Treadstone | Walbro | UpRev | Depo