View Single Post
Old 06-24-2013, 09:05 AM   #6 (permalink)
Sh0velMan
A True Z Fanatic
 
Sh0velMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 21
Sh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abm89 View Post
Based off of what I researched, the fronts should have moderate adjustment capabilities. I was okay with .2 of a degree off of the target level because the suspension has not settled yet. I will probably do another alignment after a few weeks.

The front has zero (0) adjustment for camber from the factory.

Without adjustable aftermarket arms, you get what you get.

And generally, having more camber on one side usually means that side sits lower on the suspension for one reason or another (weight imbalance, spring inconsistency, etc).

Did they put ballast weight in the car during the alignment? Was there a human sitting in the driver's seat during it? If not, that may explain why you have a little less on the driver's side without any weight in the car. Maybe Nissan engineered it to level out with a driver in the car. (dunno, just a guess)
__________________
Buy My Car! | Build Thread
Sh0velMan is offline   Reply With Quote