View Single Post
Old 06-17-2013, 03:13 PM   #33 (permalink)
Sh0velMan
A True Z Fanatic
 
Sh0velMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20
Sh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSir View Post
I just found this and the guy pretty much fixed it in that exact matter. He cut the ETI boxes out esentially used their cables as extensions to reach the MAFs then got it tuned. Starts to buck at around 3 or 4k RPMs I think i am going to do that as well if the problem doesn't go away.
Exactly what I would do.

I was doing some work on a fellow forum member's car last week and he has the AEM's. My advice to him was to let me know when he wants to get tuned and I'll make the bypass cables for the ETI boxes so that the tuner can do his MAF tables properly.

Tangent: What's funny is that the piping is laid out in the exact same configuration as my Nismo intakes. Differences being the Nismo intakes were cut in the middle for the anti-hydo-locking thingies, and therefore had the MAF sensors placed right before the TB's. Otherwise the piping path and bracketry and everything else was the same. And I mean exactly, as they are both made by AEM.
__________________
Buy My Car! | Build Thread
Sh0velMan is offline   Reply With Quote