Best Buy reviews: (taken from:
Escort, Inc 9500ix - Best Buy )
4.6 out of 5
91% of reviewers would recommend this product to a friend (82 out of 90)
Star rating... +/-1% variance
5 stars 73 81%
4 stars 10 11%
3 stars 1 1%
2 stars 2 2%
1 star 4 4%
I read the reviews starting with the
lowest rated:
First review: 1 Star
What's great about it: GPS Function
What's not so great: Does not detect LIDAR
What's not so great: Does not detect LIDAR
This is why I went with the installed unit vs a window mount. When officers use LIDAR, they aim it at something reflective, primarily front tags. If not, the front headlights. Nowhere near the windshield. So don't expect to get any signals from that. Also if you have any form of windshield tint, that will affect your detection as it can potentially scatter the incoming laser energy just like UV.
So this review is from a bad USER.
Point, Detector
Second Review: 1 Star
What's great about it: RED LIGHT CAMERA COVERAGE
What's not so great: MAC INCOMPATIBILITY AND THE NEED TO BUY PERIPHERAL PRODUCTS
What's not so great: MAC INCOMPATIBILITY AND THE NEED TO BUY PERIPHERAL PRODUCTS
Taken from Escorts Product page for the 9500ix:
https://www.escortradar.com/passport9500ix/index.php
So you don't research a product to find out what it does/does not require before purchase? Again, not a fault of the detector.
Point, Detector
Third Review:
What's great about it: Radar Detection
What's not so great: Quality - Support
What's not so great: Quality - Support
Perhaps the person put the detector in a bad spot where the GPS sensor might not get good signal, who knows. And that might be why Escort didn't give them any customer service because again, it was OPERATOR error. But since they don't describe where they have the unit mounted, all we have to go off of is their extensive experience...
Once more, potentially not a fault in the detector.
Point, Neither
Fourth review: 1 Star
What's great about it: Had fun testing it
What's not so great: didnt work that well for its price
( Click to show/hide )Being a police officer me and a few guys decided to test how these radars acctually work. The radars police use to catch speeders are capable of sending a signal that is "neverending" if you will. the signal starts to decline in as it goes, usually because of other cars, buildings etc. but when its placed on a moving object( a car) it sends us back how fast that car is going, instantly, and we then get to lock it in our radar, which is as fast as a mouse click.
SO for a long story short, this radar did pick up that there was a police radar out there, thats true, however it noticed ours at a dangerously clsoe range. if you have ever watched traffic for a long time, you began to visually tell who is driving fast and who isnt, and you use the radar usually after you have sceen someone speeding, you dont just sit there with it constantly running. it might be tuned but that doesnt mean we are pointing at you. this radar finds out after we point it at you, and chances are by the time you realize and hit that brake its already been locked.
keep in mind to that at least i find it fun to just drive around and stop at a light and then tune it and watch for a few seconds, meaning that my radar was only running for about a minute, lol. so its funny because yeah i can imagine that somewhere out there, where we are not even watching, this little device starst to go off for a little, and you slow down, but your probably not the one we were trying to catch. and then what makes it funny is you probably drive for say a half mile and see a police car, lol. so naturally you think that was the cop, but the funny thing is that he probably isnt even tuned anymore.
this product is a waste, it works for picking up the signals ill give it that, but it couldnt even get close to stoping myself or any other expirenced officer from locking in your speeding, and giving you a ticket. i wouldnt recomend this to anyone. if you dont want a ticket dont speed and you wont get one. save your 500 dollars and go buy a home theater system or a tv, or soemthing more useful.
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
Lets just preface this response with "It's a cop" so that way it's known.
That being said, his review states that the detector didn't pick up the signal "very far". Well, what is "very far" in numerical distance? His measure might not be the same as yours being a cop, so that's nullified. And he even goes on to state that it DOES work. So he's negating his own negative opinion lol This reviewers quality speaks for itself.
Point, Detector
Fifth Review: 2 Stars
What's great about it: Not Much
What's not so great: NOT GREAT
What's not so great: NOT GREAT
The reviewer says there are extra cables you need to buy (That are less than $25
). Never mentions getting them, so how do we even know his unit was actually ON?? Of course he's going to give a negative review because he got popped for his own ineptitude. The last sentence doesn't even make sense, so again, the reviewers intelligence speaks for itself.
Point, Detector
Sixth Review: 2 Stars
What's great about it: Lots of features
What's not so great: False alerts out the wazooo!
What's not so great: False alerts out the wazooo!
False alerts are common amongst ALL detectors, that's to be expected. But here's the bit again from the Escort Product page:
You have to drive by a false source 3 times before it registers it as false. So again, inept owner.
Point, Detector
Seventh Review: 3 Stars
What's great about it: Ecxellent range
What's not so great: Compatability
What's not so great: Compatability
As stated above, the product Does come with MAC software, so again a USER not correctly researching a product. And even still in their review, they list the product works with "excellent range". So once more, not a fault of the Detector.
Point, Detector.
Grand Total: 7 < 4 Star reviews, Detector still scored 6 points based on actually reading the reviews. I figure you didn't read the 4 or 5 star reviews that hail it's plus' so I won't read those either.