Quote:
Originally Posted by luigi90210
Great assumption, I totally get pissed when someone tails me /sarcasm.
I don't know about you but I just move over for dicks who want to drive wrecklessly.
What I said is true and you know it, the driver thought he saw something in the road and slammed on his brakes to keep themselves and their passengers safe and someone rear ended them because they were behind them at an unsafe distance, they will not and never will be at fault.
And if anyone has their jimmies russled, it would be you because I already said it, causing an accident on purpose is illegal, but slamming on your brakes isn't. If you haven't even picked on that by now than I really don't know what to say anymore
I'm done replying to you now. You're wasting my time with your impubescent logic and pitiful arguments.
|
This is why I'm an independent and don't align with republicans or democrats. When you align. You become one sided. One sided people will argue one point without seeing another. Not getting political but that example is based on the type of droned thinking we see on the forum.
This brake check thing has a lot of variables and a huge grey area. But extremist mentalities only see black and white.
This argument is like having two armed men with guns. One kills the other. There were no witnesses and the survivor claims self defense.
People like bucket will call him a murderer before finding out what possible evidence is available, or the variables. Not worth it bruh.