Quote:
Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370
Oh yeah identical.
Hatch vs coupe
2 seat vs 4 seat
night and day wheebases.
v6 vs v8
hydraulic steering vs electronic
300hp vs 400hp
270lbs tq vs 400lbs tq
IRS vs SRA
Wow real similar. lol 
The only thing similar is FR |
Because I said they were Identical right?
I believe I said comparable...
Oh an how blind could I have been not to see these differences.
You forgot to mention the differing color options btw...
Anyway even with all those
CRAZY differences you pointed out... they still seem to run against each other rather well. And stop quoting numbers from a spec sheet and instead look at the driving dynamics. I swear, spec sheet racing is worse than the butt dyno.
Either way... my point still stands... they are both worth the money, they both cost in the same area, and they both produce performance which would make them rivals. This gets back to what I said about people being butt hurt that the mustang is even considered a competitor... Get out from under the rock and stop living off the cool-aid.
Its not a bad thing to say a Z is comparable with 100 less hp...
Among reading this forum, and mustang forum comments. You all wanna know what the biggest reason I see people buying one or the other?
1. There aren't a billion Z's out there.
2. Mustangs have a great bang for the buck in modding.
2. People want a muscle car looking car
3. People want a sports car looking car.