Quote:
Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370
Your two word response to my response to someone else confused me as well. But since you jumped in. I assumed you're backing up Jungles point. My only original point is that mustangs and Z's are cheaper versions of higher priced precision cars, and both stang and Z relatively do their individual jobs well.
But most here denounce the Z having good performance thats GENERALLY comparable to a Porsche Cayman.
My point is the Mustang is GENERALLY comparable to a BMW M3. To denounce one(Z/Cayman) from one comparo and praise the other in another (M3/Mustang) shows bias.
Let me make clear the word "GENERALLY", DOES NOT mean the Z is a cheap Cayman twin
Both stang and Z are hatchets compared to the swords which are M3 and Porsche Cayman. What I'm saying is simple. You guys are making it complicated.
If you really read your posts against mine. You're arguing a point we agree on but you're coming from a different approach and concocting an argument.
|
To be clear here, the essence of what you said is:
"saying a Mustang handles almost as well as an M3 on a track is like saying a 370z handles almost as good a Porsche"
Which I took issue with, because the handling of the Mustang and M3 are FAR closer than that of the Z and Cayman.