Quote:
Originally Posted by TXSpeedDemon
I too briefly considered the Mustang GT. My ex girlfriend had one (think it was an 07) and for the first year I thought it was a pretty nice car. I still like the styling, but after a year there were numerous rattles in the car, and the interior paint on the stereo was already peeling off. The overall quality was just a little low. Plus, while it was fast stoplight to stoplight, on the highway (80mph+) it was slower than my Mazda.
The interior of the Z seemed to be a much higher quality, and the handling was much better. While I could take turns quickly in the Mustang it always FELT like it was at 9/10ths - about to start sliding. At the same speeds the Z feels like it's at 6/10ths. It's just much more confidence inspiring while you're driving on twisty roads. I will admit tires prob had a lot to do with this feeling since she had all seasons on the Mustang.
Space wise - we could only use the backseat of the mustang for the dog or small storage. Not really enough room for people back there comfortably, and the big hump in between the back seats prevented us from putting anything big back there without the seats flat. Also the trunk opening was small too so it was difficult to get big things in even with the rear seats flat. It will still hold more than the Z, but it will never be your first choice to haul anything around.
And the little things on the Mustang were tough. Like changing the lightbulb... should be a 5 minute job but it's so impossibly tight in there that it became a 45 minute job requiring careful manuvering needle nose pliers. While I haven't tried it on the Nissan yet, my experience with mazda and an old 300ZX tells me the Japanese just put a bit more thought into every aspect of the car.
|
I know what you mean about the Mustang not feeling as settled as the 370Z, and given the nature of the two, it doesn't surprise me. I don't see how they can even be considered competitors, especially due to the fact that it's an apples to oranges comparison. The only thing they share are similar acceleration times.
In defense of the Mustang and it's rattling issues, the 2010 model has been greatly improved; gone are the tons of cheap plastic bits. It really felt screwed together nicely.
What makes this the toughest is that I am a Muscle Car fan, through and through. Sure, my STi is an awesome car, but in the end, my Camaro is where my heart lies, despite being light-years behind the STi in all categories but a straight line.
My Camaro's giving me issues, and I need a car that's going to "substitute" when it's out of commission, which seems to be quite often; things happen at 204,000 miles. I wanted a car I could drive to shows, and in most cases, nobody's interested in looking at an import car but the "Jellybean owners (SRT-4 owners). Not to sound arrogant, but I prefer to talk to people on the same level of mentality as to a bunch of little wannabe thugs flashing off their neon-lit door panels. The "domestic crowd" are a bit older and more mature. The Mustang is a car I could proudly display amongst a different crowd.
Showing a car aside, I'm at a crossroads where I want a "muscular" car that does it all and also looks good. I'm looking for the best qualities of the STi mixed with the best qualities of the Camaro. That means that I'm looking for razor-sharp handling
and quick acceleration, but it doesn't stop there. I need a car with an engine that
screams without sounding like a lawnmower under water when under full throttle, and also has a kick in the *** that a 4 cylinder, turbocharged or otherwise, is simply not going to provide.
After driving the 370Z and giving it some thought, it just seems to me that the handling is there, the acceleration is certainly there, the "kick in the ***" feel is there, and the exhaust note is pleasant.