View Single Post
Old 02-25-2013, 12:14 PM   #9 (permalink)
wheee!
A True Z Fanatic
 
wheee!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mod Capital of Canada
Age: 58
Posts: 7,354
Drives: cars. lots of cars.
Rep Power: 40182
wheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuct View Post
toe eats up tires, but yes the front tires will last longer if you decrease camber back to the factory spec AND get the toe back to spec as well.

but the springs you have dont cause THAT great of a camber issue. your toe is more important for tire longetivity.

ideally you should have camber arms front and back.
I agree. I like the -1.6 front camber from the Swifts with stock camber arms. However, when SPL comes out with their parts, I might be swayed.....

toe is definitely more important than the small amount of negative camber you have with the swifts....
__________________

H&R / Stillen / Berk / HKS / Swift / Michelin / UpRev / SPC / Amuse Rep / Seibon / Fringe XVO / TWM / more...
My Journal
wheee! is offline   Reply With Quote