View Single Post
Old 01-28-2013, 10:09 AM   #67 (permalink)
wheee!
A True Z Fanatic
 
wheee!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mod Capital of Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 7,354
Drives: cars. lots of cars.
Rep Power: 40182
wheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond reputewheee! has a reputation beyond repute
Default

It seems that the lower rate of injection (100ml per 100kms) is part of the key to this technology. A lower consumption rate allows for a lower separation rate, hence the minimal 18A draw on the system in operation.
I would like to know what rate of consumption previous attempts were using to try and achieve similar efficiencies. I also think that the higher efficiency of the new VQ engines make this a more feasible proposition too. There is a lot to consider....
__________________

H&R / Stillen / Berk / HKS / Swift / Michelin / UpRev / SPC / Amuse Rep / Seibon / Fringe XVO / TWM / more...
My Journal
wheee! is offline   Reply With Quote