Dear WSTAR,
if you go to click on HHO KITS for my site, you can read in English what I think of European and USA vendors of HHO Kit.
I was the first in Italy from 2005 that has always maintained that the HHO kit is a Scam.
The project that I built for Nissan is an implant .... and not a kit ... I know perfectly well the laws of physics, so the reference to Wikipedia I know him ...I'm not a mechanic, but an engineer graduated in 1975 in electrical engineering ... when colleges were for students who wanted to study with passion.
In relation to my Patent, the Patent Centre Munchen international
replied that:
3.2 This feature allows to carry out water electrolysis consuming less energy.
3.3 The problem to be solved by the present invention may be regarded as providing a system for carryng out an electrolysis having improved energetic efficiency.
3.4 The solution to this problem proposed in claim 8 Theirof the present application is considered as involving an inventive step for the following reasons :there is neither a disclosure nor a hint in the available prior art to add a control unit as describedin claim 11 to the system of document D2.
An Electrolytic cell having one cathode and more than one anode is known ( see document D3), but it is not suitable for producing oxy-hydrogen gas,since oxygen is not produced in this cell. The skilled person would therefore not be encouraged to combine the teaching of D3 with the cell disclosed by D2.
4.0 Claims 2-10 are dependent on one or more independent claims whose subject-matter is considered as being new and inventive, as discussed above, and as such said dependent claims also meet the requirements of novelty and inventive step.
This is all
Best Regards
Lorenz
|