View Single Post
Old 12-06-2012, 04:09 PM   #67 (permalink)
Mitco39
A True Z Fanatic
 
Mitco39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,089
Drives: 40th 370z
Rep Power: 132
Mitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond reputeMitco39 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPenvy View Post
wouldnt weight also be a factor in this or are you just setting one weight in the equation?

i mean with higher HP youre typically adding weight with engine parts, turbos, coolers, etc...

i know it may not matter since its just a simple equation for fun purposes but just a thought lol

Take a look at the spreadsheet I put up in my thread.

These values are calculated taking into account weight (I had it set at 3300 lbs), wind resistance (assuming 0.30 CD) and the torque curve of our cars. What I did was took a stock dyno chart and then scaled it up to get the desired peak hp's. Again not entirely correct but I believe is a valid assumption as typically the TQ curves are just magnified when adding boost.


To add to my other post.

Time from 0-160
640hp = 12 s
550hp = 14.3 s
500hp = 15.85 s
450hp = 17.9 s
400hp = 20.5 s
350hp = 24.2 s
300hp = 29.7 s


Again just based on the math.

At speeds such as those weight really plays very little in determining power to overcome resistance at those speeds.
__________________
2007 Chevy Duramax - EFILive Tuned By Me
2010 40th W/ Nav - Boosted Performance - UpRev Tuned By Me
The Mrs. Ride -2012 335XI N55 BMW - Cobb Tuned By Me, Built by her
My Build --> http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...39s-build.html

Last edited by Mitco39; 12-06-2012 at 04:14 PM.
Mitco39 is offline   Reply With Quote