Quote:
Originally Posted by Megan370z
so if a stock 2012 was in the 28x whp
that mean this 342whp isnt too exeptional afterall...
I went from 256 to 324 without VVEL tuning which is 68whp more and let assume Mike had exactly 280whp as a baseline.. he got +62whp up to 342whp
the biggest difference between him and my setup is the oversized TB other than that the rest is pretty similar.
|
It's worth it to take some advice I heard once from a very wise man about how to compare dyno numbers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red__Zed
Don't.
|
But if you must, account for some of the potential differences...by watching percentages.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red__Zed
PP numbers are more telling. 10whp over a 200whp baseline is 5PP, over a 300whp baseline it is 3.33...pp. basically takes the inflationary nature of dyno out, which does a lot to level the numbers.
|
If, for instance, we choose to compare mike's gains to yours, say...
(342-280)/280~= 22.1% gain
(324-256)/256~= 26.6% gain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo!
I don't know where Mike is, but your numbers are severely negatively affected by power and elevation, even with very high CF's.
At sea level in FL, where I am, the summer heat and humidity will absolutely kill power, no matter how much correction is used.
The SAE guys need to develop better corrections for their estimates...  |
And this is why I'm always loathe to compare numbers.