View Single Post
Old 10-30-2012, 12:45 PM   #134 (permalink)
SS_Firehawk
Premium Member
 
SS_Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335
SS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

You keep referring to auctions as if it's the only way of resale or determining factor of worth. I already substantiated my claim. In the middle of writing this NADAguides.com is currently down while I was "substantiating" my claim. I'm not sorry to tell you that you are still wrong when comparing value of the Z and Mustang. Didn't have time to do the EVO X. Either way your wrong. You claim that the 370z holds it's value substantially less than competing vehicles and that's been blown out of the water like a torpedo hitting a U boat. Sports cars period hold their value better than the run of the mill vehicle because it's a purchase made out of desire, not necessity. "I sure needed that EVO X to haul my family around..." I don't think that ever crossed anyone's mind. You think those dudes buying station wagon CTS-V's are buying them because they are worried about hauling **** around, no... they just want to haul a$$. 10 years from now, when there are a sea of Mustangs and Camaros driving around, wait, there already are... Because there are 10x less 370Z's, that alone will keep resale up. If you need a history lesson, look at the low volume Japanese sports cars of the 90's compared to the high selling domestics.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction

SS_Firehawk is offline   Reply With Quote