Thread: wstar's Journal
View Single Post
Old 09-01-2012, 09:41 AM   #491 (permalink)
wstar
A True Z Fanatic
 
wstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594
wstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond repute
Default

No problem on the bump, this journal is long overdue for updates anyways.

And yes, I realized I made an error there some time ago, but my brake saga has been a long and varied one, and I wanted to get to the bottom of everything before I updated again. You're right about the tolerances. The actual specs are:

Thickness Variation: .0006" (all 4 corners)
Front Runout: .0014"
Rear Runout: .0022"

So yes, even after indexing, two of my rotors were out of spec in that case by my own measurement (one of the rears and one of the fronts). However, I can't say *definitively* whether the rotors were truly bad, because I did my runout measurements with the lugnuts just barely tightened on the rotors (no wheel of course). I could have made more effort to torque them down properly with a washer under the lugnut, but I didn't because even with the light torquing the readings were "in spec", except I was looking at the wrong specs I had written down , and I didn't discover my numerical problem until a couple months later when I was re-reading the specs in the service manual to measure another set of rotors.

Follow-up post incoming with the whole Brakes Rotors Saga this car has been through in recent months.
__________________
7AT Track Car!
Journal thread / Car setup details
wstar is offline   Reply With Quote