View Single Post
Old 08-06-2012, 11:23 PM   #139 (permalink)
RiCharlie
Track Member
 
RiCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Johnston RI
Posts: 857
Drives: 370 Touring Spt A/t
Rep Power: 16
RiCharlie is just really niceRiCharlie is just really niceRiCharlie is just really niceRiCharlie is just really niceRiCharlie is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmhenderson View Post
So the epilogue to this story is:

You cannot claim diminished value on a comprehensive claim. Diminished value is covered under the language of your collision coverage and requires there to be an "at fault" party. As the deer was not carrying insurance and is not in a position to have her wages garnished at this point, I'm SOL (just for future reference)
You may think you are SOL.. but not compared to the deer...
RiCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote