Quote:
Originally Posted by GaleForce
RAW files must/need editing and have more available options for editing over jpeg. If you took two pictures at the same time of the same subject, straight from the camera, the jpeg will look better than the RAW because the camera adds its own ideals (contrast, saturation, etc) to the jpeg. If you don't have time for editing, or can get everything "right" (exposure, white balance, etc) from the start, then jpeg is fine.
|
Ahhh, Thank you mr.gale.
I think for the most part I can use jpeg. I read that white balance correction especially for indoor or night shots is one major benefit over jpeg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LunaZ
RAW is so much easier to tweak than JPEG because you have a lot more parameters by which to fine tune adjust the photo.
It's not that you can't get it right in camera with a RAW picture, but every shot can benefit from a little nudge on the sliders for white balance, highlights, shadows, whites, blacks, sharpness, etc...
I work in Adobe Lightroom with my before and after side by side. This way I can see my changes and also make sure that I'm not straying too far from the truth. Not that digitally altered pictures aren't an art form in and of themselves, but I like to try to stay faithful to what I saw unless I'm blatantly putting out something that's not supposed to look like reality.
|
Hey Luna.
yah I think for those hard to edit situations raw appears to be the way to go.
I think i will start taking raw + jpeg and have raw as backup just in case I run into a shot I can't get the color corrected in jpeg.
