Thread: Boss 302? ...No Thanks! I will take a Volvo please?
View Single Post
Old 06-15-2012, 03:43 PM   #12 (permalink)
shadoquad
A True Z Fanatic
 
shadoquad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3886
shadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond repute
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by m4a1mustang View Post
We all know you're a troll when you compare a GT class SCCA World Challenge Volvo to a Grand AM Boss 302R, which is more comparable to the World Challenge GTS class.

Pobst, in the GT class Volvo, took pole at 1:26.361.

The fastest GTS class car, a TSX driven by Pete Cunningham, went 1:33.094.

The fastest 370Z in GTS went 1:37.561. The fastest Mustang in GTS went 1:34.369.

For reference, Joe Foster qualified 4th at 1:36.375 in the Boss onboard you posted of the Conti Challenge qualifying session. Pole that year was by a Camaro GS.R at 1:36.049.

We get it. We know you hate the Mustang and we know you'll do anything you can to disparage it. Even if it makes you look like a total idiot by posting a World Challenge GT time and comparing it to Conti Challenge GS or World Challenge GTS cars. Sorry, but none of us are dumb enough to buy that comparison.
This is a relevant factual post here, but I think what you mean to say is that the 370z obviously finished faster. As we all know, it can handle
shadoquad is offline