View Single Post
Old 03-12-2012, 01:09 PM   #15 (permalink)
Cmike2780
A True Z Fanatic
 
Cmike2780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,059
Drives: slowwww
Rep Power: 29
Cmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond reputeCmike2780 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spikuh View Post
This is pretty much my next question. Why 1.25? Where are they getting it from?

Instead of:



Shouldn't it be:

292whp x 1.20 = ~350hp
230wtq x 1.20 = ~276tq

Then using that 1.20 to finish out, their final numbers would be:

340whp x 1.20 = 408hp
260wtq x 1.20 = 312tq

Is this the wrong approach?
I think that's right and closer to the truth.

350hp (per Nissan)/292whp (dyno)= x(approx. hp @ flywheel)/340whp (dyno)
x=407.53 hp @ the crank.

Still pretty good numbers even if the dyno reads high. You can inflate the numbers, but you should only be looking at the difference from the baseline anyways. My understanding was, that the 48whp increase from baseline is more important than the actual hp reading on the dyno.

This a link on there for determining the numbers they used.
http://dyno-comp.com/tuning.php#dyno101

Seems kind of odd. It would mean most stock non-Nismo's should have numbers closer to 345hp at the flywheel.
__________________
[09][MB][6-Spd MT][Touring][Stillen Gen III][K&N][Borla CBE][Evo-R]


Last edited by Cmike2780; 03-12-2012 at 01:17 PM.
Cmike2780 is offline