View Single Post
Old 03-08-2012, 10:15 AM   #117 (permalink)
F.I. Inc.
The370Z.com Sponsor
 
F.I. Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 2,989
Drives: 2010 GT-R/2007 F-250
Rep Power: 685
F.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAM@GTM View Post
No it wont. And even if it does, Why would you do that, We are making Over 500 RWHP on stock exhausts and Stock cats.

Don't worry i get it Dan

Sam


Sam,

Running stock cats on a force inducted car for a long period of time is a bad idea unless the car came like that OEM. Do not get me wrong, I am not condoning taking smog devices off of cars specifically in California. Hats off to you guys for trying to make smog compliant kit! That will be huge so best of luck getting that.

Boost is back pressure as we all know. So in a nutshell you are saying the kit needs the back pressure from stock (restrictive exhaust components specifically stock cats) to keep the head unit in it's efficiency range! That means the kit is inefficient!

Why not make a Supercharger system that is efficient with a free flowing exhaust system and advertise it both ways? Make the most amount of power on the least amount of boost one way and also show what it does with in stock form. In the end, the free flowing exhaust will have much less wear and tear on the drive train and especially the engine!

Less heat, less friction and the parts will all last longer!

Tony
__________________
Follow us on Facebook: Fast Intentions Inc.
Phone: (805) 522-FAST (3278)
Email: tony@fastintentions.com
www.fastintentions.com
"FUELED BY PASSION"

Last edited by F.I. Inc.; 03-08-2012 at 04:37 PM.
F.I. Inc. is offline   Reply With Quote