Quote:
Originally Posted by b1adesofcha0s
Brady does not have a well rounded offense. Their running game is terrible. He doesn't have the best receiving corps either. Part of what makes them look so good is how well Brady throws it to them. He turns mediocre receivers into all stars, as long as they don't keep dropping the ball (like they did in the SB) 
I haven't really watched football long enough to know how good or bad they were back when they were winning Super Bowls. I have seen that receivers are that are great with the Patriots are not so much other places, whether before or after they were on the Pats team. Welker and Moss weren't all that amazing till they joined Brady on the Patriots. Look what happened to Moss after he got kicked off the team. We could definitely use help from another receiver like him who is more motivated to give it his all on every play. |
Brady's in a terrific offense. When he got injured years ago, it didn't skip a beat. Matt Cassel looked like the second coming of Unitas. Cassel went to KC and became a nobody. The Pats have not had a real running offense since the beginning of the Belichek era, but they're always high scoring.
Moss was incredible in Minnesota way before he went to the Patriots. He was the best receiver in the league with a young Daunte Culpepper throwing to him.
I'm not saying Brady's bad or even average. He just wouldn't be what he is in any other system. Same argument can be made about Joe Montana.
Peyton Manning, however, was Indy's entire offense, and it showed this year.