View Single Post
Old 12-16-2011, 02:26 AM   #44 (permalink)
KingZee
A True Z Fanatic
 
KingZee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Glendale, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,612
Drives: Focus ST
Rep Power: 423
KingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond reputeKingZee has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rui Z View Post
As acting owner of the Hornets, Stern had every right to not accept a trade he didn't like. Just like every owner in the league has a right to say 'no' to a trade that their GM proposes. However, if the reason Stern didn't accept the trade was because of the whiny small market owners, then I agree that the commissioner was wrong in not accepting the trade. But listening to Stern's explanation, I believe he just wanted a better deal than the Lakers trade proposal.
exactly what I'm talking about right here: For David Stern, questions about possible conflict of interest - latimes.com
__________________
Focus ST
KingZee is offline