View Single Post
Old 07-29-2009, 12:42 PM   #59 (permalink)
tooohip
A True Z Fanatic
 
tooohip's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,626
Drives: 09 370z CY To/Sp
Rep Power: 270
tooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond reputetooohip has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sashimi View Post
I personally think you should go with Canon. I've worked with tons of profesional photographers and about 90% of them use Canon over Nikon. Plus I don't really like Nikon's photo processor I think it make a lot of things look really fake.

Plus for price it seems like Canon always give you more.
You sound like you don't know much about cameras or just repeat what you are told.

First of all, Nikon vs. Canon is pointless. They both make great camera systems. The real choice when starting out is really who makes the lenses you like best, then go with that manufacturers body.

To me, Nikons "feel" better in my hand. On top of that, I have many lenses that I have acquired over the years, that I can still use on my digital Nikon bodies, so I have stuck with Nikon.

As to "Nikon's photo processor making things look really fake" I'd have to ask you what the heck you are talking about? If anything, Canon places more "default" processing on a captured image, not Nikon!

The way the camera comes out of the camera depends on a multitude of in camera settings. I personally shoot raw and leave the processing to post exposure.
__________________
Lance
KW Variant 3 Coilovers | Stillen Sways | Stillen Gen III Intake | AAM HFC | AAM True Dual CBE | AAM Comp Oil Cooler | Hawk HPS Pads | Volk TE-37 | Hoser Keg Tap
tooohip is offline   Reply With Quote